On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 05:29 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote: > We (The EPEL Steering Committee) are following up on EPEL issue > 136[1] regarding the status of EPEL8 Playground. > > Looking through the logs we see that there are still people building > against playground on a regular basis. But as I look into each of > those packages, the same package is built in both epel8 and epel8- > playground, at the same time. > > This leads me to believe that the only reason people are still > building on playground is because they feel obligated to, not because > they really need someplace to test things out. > > So, if anyone is still using epel8-playground for something they > can't get from epel8-next and/or COPR, please let us know. > Otherwise we will shut it down and call it an interesting experiment. Will the repositories remain available after the shutdown, or is the plan to sunset those too? Cheers Davide _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
