On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 03:10:58PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >- builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (the no-cost variant is > > OK as well, though [2]) > > I cannot help myself but I consider this very unpleasant for EPEL packagers. > > Getting and configuring the subscription was always so unfriendly > for me that I've been using EPEL mocks even for my RHEL work. This > basically means using EPEL mocks will once again be as complicated > as using RHEL. I'm not opposed to working with our friends over at Alma on this, but I think we _also_ should fix this. Would it help if we made it easy to add a RHEL developer entitlement (the 16 no-cost RHEL license thing) to a Fedora Account (perhaps with a check-box agreement in the account system, like the FPCA), and made it trivial in mock use that? I mean, seriously, RH should make this easy for Fedora packagers. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
