Re: EPEL 9 Next Bodhi updates: Set lower days to stable limit?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 1:15 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 19. 11. 21 17:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx
> > > <mailto:smooge@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > >
> > >     On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >     <mailto:mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > >      >
> > >      > Hello EPEL people,
> > >      >
> > >      > what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for
> > >      > EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)?
> > >      >
> > >
> > >     I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes
> > >     should have a small stable limit. 3 days sounds about right.
> > >
> > >
> > > +1
> >
> > There seem to be a consensus, do I file a ticket at infra, or does the EPSCo
> > need to approve it a meeting?
> >
> 
> Please file a ticket with infra about it.

wow... consensus in 1.5 hours. :) 

Perhaps this should be discussed at the next meeting? To allow
interested parties to actually see it and comment?

Anyhow, I'm personally fine with it, but note that 3 days leaves very
little time for testing. One of those days is likely mirror sync/getting
the update, so interested testers would need to update at least every
day to make sure and not miss out. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux