On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 3:36 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > *this is worth a discussion in todays EPEL Steering Committee Meeting* > > It sounds like the epel9-next is going to startup by building against the CS buildroot. Changing it at this time would cause a delay. > > Thus we need to write some "verify build deps are released" checker. I have an idea of how to do this, so I'm willing to volunteer to write and run something. > > But, it would be good to have some discussion to determine if we want to keep using the CS buildroot for epel9-next, always. Or if we want to use it just as a bootstrap mechanism, and then switch to building just off the available CentOS Stream repos at some point. > > Thoughts? > Should we always use buildroot? Or just keep up until we're fairly stable? > We should only use the buildroot repo for as long as we need to. The *sooner* we can switch to the published content, the better. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
