On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 5:39 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 01. 10. 21 22:11, Troy Dawson wrote: > > I'll have to file all those "please move these packages into CRB" bugz after > > RHEL9 is out. > > I wonder whether we should file those before it is out, if at all possible? > Ideally, yes because it's an extreme pain to deal with them post-GA. Red Hat's policies around this stuff is such that after 9.0, they can only be introduced in 6 month intervals (that is, we have to wait for 9.1 for them to show up in EPEL9). We should *never* use the buildroot repository for EPEL-Next because it massively complicates discovering this stuff and getting it straightened out immediately. Unlike CentOS SIGs that only build for CentOS Stream, EPEL needs to work on RHEL, and Red Hat will *never* ship the buildroot repo for RHEL, because it opens up the door for things to depend on that content, which is highly problematic for them. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
