On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import > to EPEL8 and EPEL7: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/32 > > So far, there has been no response. Is there anybody willing to merge them? > They are manually tested, as indicated in the comments. > > When we introduce new macros to Fedora, I strive to backport them to EPELs > if possible, so package maintainers don't need to think "may I use this?" if > they desire EPEL compatibility. However, I don't want to merge my own pull > requests to epel-rpm-macros (unless they are urgent bug fixes). I can merge them... I just didn't notice them somehow. I guess because they were while I was on PTO and I missed them when catching up. Usually a ping in PR would let me know about them... > A meta question: Should the epel-sig group co-maintain the package? They could if desired. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
