On 22. 07. 21 21:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 07. 21 21:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
I've been bitten by this yet again. A package needing /usr/bin/python and
not python2 or python3. And it's way down in the code so it's hard to
patch. But, it works fine on Fedora.
Is anyone in the middle of porting python-unversioned-command over to epel8?
If not, does anyone object to me porting it over?
I wonder how would that package work?
/usr/bin/python is co-owned by several RHEL-proper packages and managed by
alternatives.
I hit "Send" to early, apologies, here is the rest of my email:
Could you please share the package spec file with us (Python Maint team at Red
Hat, specifically Tomas Orsava and me) before you actually push it to EPEL, so
we get a chance to review it (and maybe test it)?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
