On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:11 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 08:29:17AM -0400, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> I have opened a bugzilla to get an EPEL8 branch for pdsh [1], and I've also
> reached out to the current maintainers directly and have not heard anything
> back. I am not sure what the next steps are in getting an EPEL8 build of
> pdsh. I would be happy to become the maintainer of the EPEL builds for
> pdsh.
If reaching out to them directly isn't getting results, there is the
non-responsive maintainer process:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/#steps
EPEL Packages have a modified version of the non-responsive package maintainer.
This is for stalled requests, which is a bit different than non-responsive package maintainers. Fedora package maintainers don't have to do anything with EPEL if they don't want to, thus we needed it to be a bit different.
Troy
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
