On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:32:25AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:20 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: ...snip... Here's a scratch build of 1.4.11, but I bet it won't work as many of the php-pear packages are too old. ;( https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=68489451 > > I am wondering if we need a different way to announce reasons for this: > > > > [ ] I no longer use RHEL-7 so can not test > > [ ] I found that there are too many package updates needed that I do not > > have time for. > > [ ] The following RHEL packages are too old for this package to be updated > > [ ] The upstream is dead and I can not fix > > ... > > Or maybe instead of saying it's retiring, do Fedora's Orphaning format. > Announce they are orphaning the package, and if a package is orphaned for a > certain amount of time, and has all the orphan annoucements, it get's > removed. > But I do like your checkbox way for announcing the reasons for > retiring/orphaning. Well, thats what goes in the dead.package file when the package is retired. :) I was just wanting to stop shipping a known vulnerable package and get it off my dashboard with all it's CVE's. I'm pretty sure 1.4.11 isn't actually going to work, but happy for someone to prove me wrong. I don't really have the time to investigate further myself. So, I will orphan it now, if no one takes it in a while, I will retire it then? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
