On Thu, 13 May 2021, Nick Howitt wrote:
On 13/05/2021 10:21, Nick Howitt wrote:
On 13/05/2021 09:55, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Thursday, 13 May 2021 at 10:21, Nick Howitt wrote:
Hi,
This app recently updated and I've noticed that it stomped on my
/etc/sysconfig/postrgey file isn't this wrong? Looking at the spec file,
in
the %files section it has:
%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/postgrey
Shouldn't this be:
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/postgrey
It most probably should. This looks like a packaging bug and I'd suggest
opening a bug report, with a patch or even a pull request against the
spec file.
Regards,
Dominik
I've found the bug tracker and filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960184. I'm lousy at creating
patch files so I've ducked it.
Ugh not an easy bug. The unit file has changed (or the requirements for
startup options have) so the sysconfig file needs more options in it. It is a
pity there was not a "%config noreplace" but with a smart %post to add the
extra parameters needed.
I think I'll mark the bug as invalid.
In that case, shouldn't we change the line to
%config %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/postgrey
so that the old file is saved at
%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/postgrey.rpmsave
?
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
