On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 4:44:58 PM CET Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:30:21AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Honestly I don't know how to deal with regular EPEL-8 development after > > this. EPEL is going to add an epel-next which they would ask for additional > > targets in mock for. However that does not fix building against the regular > > EPEL-8 target. I expect it will depend on what programs come up for > > development in the coming year and if the new -devel RHEL UBI images can be > > used for mock. > > Or just the no-cost RHEL developer subscription? It seems like this is a > good use case for that, if it could be made easy enough that it isn't > painful for EPEL packagers. Notable problem if we switched from CentOS to RHEL in Mock configuration is that several build dependencies will be missing. RHEL 8 doesn't e.g. ship e.g. the *-devel packages (this problem, if I understand it correctly, is slowly worked-around by CentOS-only packages). NB there already is such equivalent configuration, 'mock -r rhelepel-8-x86_64'. But RH-subscribed :-) Fedora is needed. Pavel _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
