Re: Proposal for RHEL8 missing -devel packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/11/20 5:04 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12/12/20 12:12 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
There is also a problem if a missing package has been specifically
blocked by a module.  I think libuv-devel is this way.

If that happens, wouldn't it be blocked in both scenarios (module+grobisplitter+tagging and devel-only-component)? Or would grobisplitter put them in an additional repo with module_hotfixes=yes?

If that's the case, it might be possible to create a separate repo with such packages only and manually tag them there. E.g. after a build I'd do `koji tag epel8-buildroot-module-hotfixes foo-devel-1.6-5.el8` and the epel8-buildroot-module-hotfixes repo would be available from EPEL 8 Koji/mock builds with module_hotfixes=yes. Yes, unlike the rest of this proposal, it requires some work (on infra to set up this extra repo and on packagers to remember to do the tagging, but that still sounds like less work than the grobisplitter proposal for both groups).

Is there any easy way to tell if a package is explicitly blocked vs just not being present.

We discussed this in the EPEL Steering Committee this week, and your
way has alot less "mess with the server and modules" work.
It would probably get us up to 75% of the missing packages.

If people who have been waiting for packages want to give this a try
and show what they did for others to follow, that would be great.
I'll probrubly do it for some of the packages I want.  And see what
type of scripts, patches, and other things are needed.

Let me know if you have a devel package in mind and I can give it a try.

Can we just jump in and try this out? I'd like to get qpdf-devel available. If so, I guess I would do:

fedpkg request-repo --exception qpdf-devel

right?

--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems          720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                 https://www.nwra.com/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux