On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:17:46AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > wrt https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/ > > Since EPEL 8 is for RHEL 8 and EPEL Next 8 is for CentOS Stream 8, I assumed > we will continue to use CentOS Linux 8 for local mock (and Copr) builds of > EPEL 8 packages. The same for EPEL 9. > > However, since CentOS Linux 8 (and 9!) will be no more, do we have some > ideas how to handle this? Do we require all EPEL contributors to obtain the > developer RHEL subscription (seems like a huge pain)? Do we switch to Oracle > Linux (only half joking)? Do we try to fight this decision (however I am > afraid I've exhausted my fight capacity on different decisions)? > > Not looking for specific answers yet, this is more a discussion kick off. I guess this is a decision for the mock/copr maintainers in the end? but yeah, not sure what the best way is. We do have some time... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
