On 09.12.20 11:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: > However, since CentOS Linux 8 (and 9!) will be no more, do we have some > ideas how to handle this? Do we require all EPEL contributors to obtain > the developer RHEL subscription (seems like a huge pain)? Do we switch > to Oracle Linux (only half joking)? Do we try to fight this decision > (however I am afraid I've exhausted my fight capacity on different > decisions)? Intuitively, I think that requiring RHEL dev subscriptions would pretty much kill EPEL packaging on Copr. Unless you specifically want to create EPEL packages, why would you get and keep a RHEL dev subscription when you could just not check the EPEL-boxes? >From a purely technical perspective, i.e. pretending it were CentFork Community Linux, are there reasons not to use Oracle Linux? Christopher _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
