On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:08 AM Antonio T. sagitter <sagitter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all. > > Why openblas-0.3.5 is waiting for stable branch since 2 years? [1] > > Is it reasonable, taking into account the rebuilds of dependent > packages, to rebuild openblas on epel7 by using a more recent GCC > version like GCC-8 or GCC-9 ? > > > [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-abb5b76382 > -- This is a very good question. I thought I had already gone through all the old open bodhi issues. But it looks like my search wasn't good enough. If I do a bodhi updates query --status testing --submitted-before 2019 There are 152 EPEL7 and EPEL8 packages. :( Actually, now that I look at it ... I did that cleanup about a year and a half ago and it looks like things have grown since then. Sorry, I'm not helping with openblas. That is up to the maintainer. It looks like it will install. My opinion is to move it to stable, and if you want a rebuild, rebuild it and have a seperate update. I'll probably do another round of cleanup, but that will be a different email, different subject. Troy _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
