On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 13.10.20 um 10:12 schrieb Christopher Engelhard: > > On 12.10.20 10:49, Leon Fauster wrote: > > > Not sure but IIRC EPEL should not depend on software collections ...? > > > > Can someone confirm that? If the package can't depend on php7.2+, then > > the question of how to deal with EPEL7 is moot. > > > > My recall was this > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/DBAQB3V35TXPNUV4UKKHXUC52BENZJUQ/ It's changed a bit since then. We now allow scls if: * They only need to be used at build time (ie, the rpms produced do not require users to install/enable any scls) * They are approved by the epel steering comittee. So far we have only enabled devtoolset. (so for example, chromium uses devtoolset to build with a newer gcc, but does not require users to install or enable anything to use it). In the case of php, this would likely not work because it would require users to install/enable php to get the webserver module or cmd line. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
