Re: EPEL repos packaged for Fedora (for repoquery)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 02:06:43PM +0200, Miro Hron=C4=8Dok wrote:
> On 07. 07. 20 14:08, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> > On 6/30/20 9:10 PM, Miro Hron=C4=8Dok wrote:
> > > On 30. 06. 20 21:03, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > I don't think a package-review is needed? It would just be unretiri=
ng
> > > > the fedora branches of an existing package?
> > >=20
> > > Technically, the package is "retired for 8+ weeks" on Fedora. Hence
> > > a new review request.
> > >=20
> > > > That said, I am -1 on the idea.
> > > >=20
> > > > You have no idea how many people try to install epel packages on fe=
dora.
> > > > We had to explicitly add a Conflicts to try and reduce this, and th=
at
> > > > was with them in another repo entirely!
> > > >=20
> > > > I fear if we do this more people will start installing stuff from e=
pel
> > > > on fedora and cause a lot of breakage.
> > >=20
> > > I understand the concern, but am not considering it a blocker for
> > > this, especially since people will find a way to download the epel
> > > packages anyway. This does not allow `dnf install epel-release` on
> > > Fedora neither are the repos enabled. The amount of work to actually
> > > use this package to install epel packages on Fedora is more or less
> > > the same as downloading the packages from Koji or EPEL mirrors.
> >=20
> >=20
> > +1 from me. People will always do weird things, if they want rope, I sa=
y
> > let them have it.
> > But that shouldn't stop us from making life easier for packagers. I
> > myself would use this.
>=20
> The discussion kinda stopped. I don't want to force the package in, but I=
'd
> like to have some resolution. Is there a better way to achieve the result=
s
> with less risk?

Well, not sure. Is there some way to put the repo files in a doc space
or something and only get repoquery to use them, not normal dnf
commands? I can't think of how to make it work, but perhaps dnf people
could? could we request a special /etc/dnf/repoquery.d/ dir or
something?

Failing that, can they at least have a big comment block explaining that
you shouldn't use them to install any packages with?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux