On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 06:30:04AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:42:15PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > > > Shortly (Martin is in Cc to confirm): > > > > > > 1) Make a module: > > > > > > $ fedpkg clone cmake3 > > > $ fedpkg request-repo --namespace modules --exception cmake3-latest > > > $ fedpkg request-branch --namespace modules --repo cmake3-latest epel8 > > > > > This will request for creating "cmake3-latest" module and "cmake3-latest" > > repository and "epel8" stream and "epel8" branch. I don't know if you > > really > > want to create "cmake3-latest:epel8" module stream. > > > > Since this is a module, is there any point in using the cmake3 namespace > over just cmake? > I cannot see any point. Maybe if there were cmake-2 or cmake-4 incompatible to cmake-3 but installable in parallel, then it would make sense. (Like Python.) Because you cannot install more streams of the same module at the same time. Otherwise I would also go with plain "cmake" module name. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
