On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 12:11:58PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 05. 20 11:46, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Question: should I be using %{python3_pkgversion} at all? Some packages
> > still use it, e.g. python3-ply (python36-ply binary package), and
> > some don't.
>
> 0) It is no longer required from technical point of view.
> 1) There was no announcement not to use it.
> 2) There was never a hard rule to use it.
> 3) I'd personally still use it, for consistency.
Would it be needed if we moved from say python 3.6 to python 3.8?
But I guess python 3.6 is going to be maintained the entire life of
rhel7?
kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
