Re: Playground policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/1/20 12:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There was no 'rule' but the intent was everyone would keep the
package.cfg and build for both. If they were not making any playground
changes, they didn't need to commit anything, and fedpkg build would
just build for both epel8 and epel8-playground.

The problem is that the packages.cfg commit annoys everyone who does a
'merge origin/master' because it's not on the master branch, so they
delete it to get their workflow back.

I'd like to look at seeing if we can accomplish what we wanted with
playground by having it just inherit from epel8.

Failing that, we could just look at dropping playground if it's not
useful for people.
Yeah, having epel8-playground automatically inherit from epel8 would solve a lot of issues, it seems. I personally don't mind merging from master -- I don't want to build every Fedora revision for EPEL -- but I can understand how some maintainers might prefer otherwise.


The purpose of epel8-playground is to diverge when needed. That's why the epel8
branch contains package.cfg by default.

That seems to be the case for packages branched normally (fedpkg
request-branch). *However* I've seen some packages where the epel8 branch
and master branch are identical -- not sure how it happens, maybe the
committer has force-push permission? Or is there a way to request that a
branch be cloned from another branch instead of created from scratch?

There's no force-push allowed. They likely just deleted it and are
merging master over it.

Interesting. Could you help take a look at
- python-mimeparse
- python-testscenarios

and help figure out how epel8 and master end up sharing a history?

Thanks,

--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 96A7 A6ED FB4D 2113 4056 3257 CAF9 AD10 ACB1 BEF2
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux