On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 4:25 PM James Cassell <fedoraproject@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Historical composes are intended to be frozen and unchanging, but this > > > approach leaves open the possibility of tagging other builds into > > > epel8-8.Y and regenerating the compose if the need arises. It will > > > need to be communicated that these repositories will not receive > > > updates and are intended to be only a snapshot of the past that is > > > known to work with a particular RHEL 8.Y base. > > > > This will be very helpful, especially if the epel-release .repo file honors the $releasever variable. Can you explain what behavior you see here? I can't really parse from your reply what you think/expect to have happen here, and I'd like to make sure we address it properly. _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
