On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 17:29, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 23:06, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[...]
> This is not a zero cost on our side to keep this going, and its benefits
> are currently to 90 systems versus 1.5 million systems (x86_64). If it is
> important enough that we need to keep doing it, then we will have to find
> something else to drop.
Are these numbers the number of unique IPs accessing EPEL repos?
If yes, the difference in magnitude is staggering and I have no
doubts it's not worth the effort to keep maintaining ppc64 builders
for such small user base.
88 ppc64
217 ppc64le
38 659 x86_32
1 591 787 x86_64
are the average at least 1 checkin per unique ip address per day.
Oh well. At least I managed to report quite a few endianness-related
bugs thanks to ppc64 support in Fedora. ;)
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
