Thanks a lot for the helpful answer. I will request the fuse3 repo or get the current fuse maintainer to do it. Dave On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:33:37PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "DD" == David Dykstra <dwd@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > DD> Does this also imply a new fuse3 package in pagure & bodhi? Or > DD> could it still be part of the fuse package but have a separate > DD> fuse3.spec? > > It would have to be a separate package repository and receive separate > updates. It is not possible for a source package in EPEL to have the > same name as a source package in RHEL, even if the build products > (binary RPMs) have different names. > > Note that a package review is not required to create a package > repository named "fuse3" (or "fuse3.7" or whatever) when the "fuse" > package repository already exists. See > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process > When running fedpkg request-repo, use the --exception flag. > > - J< _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
