Re: Major upgrade for singularity in EPEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The pagure issue
    https://pagure.io/epel/issue/53
was already approved so I will now do the builds and give them a 4 week
testing period.

Dave

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:47:43AM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Thanks very much for your reply, Stephen.
> 
> I have already done scratch builds for EPEL 6 & 7 so that's not a problem.
> 
> The primary reason for upgrading to singularity-3 is that development
> has stopped on singularity-2 and users have been asking me to upgrade
> because they want some of the newer features.  I will go ahead and
> create a pagure issue.
> 
> Dave
> 
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 06:04:42AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 18:29, David Dykstra <dwd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > singularity-3.1.1 was just released upstream, and I think it is at this
> > > point compatible enough with singularity-2 to upgrade it in EPEL6 and
> > > EPEL7.  I have had singularity-3 releases in Fedora for over 3 months,
> > > but have been holding off on EPEL upgrades because it is a complete
> > > rewrite in another language (golang instead of C) and initially had some
> > > incompatibilities.  There is no more development happening in
> > > singularity-2, although the startup company that supplies long term
> > > support for singularity-2 (Sylabs) has promised to release any security
> > > patches that it develops.
> > >
> > > Is there any objection, or any process that needs to be gone through, in
> > > order to do this type of major upgrade in EPEL?
> > 
> > I would start by doing scratch builds to see if there are versions of
> > go which will compile the code in EPEL-6 and EPEL-7. I am expecting
> > EPEL-6 might be too old and is only got a 18 months of life left so
> > keeping it at -2 and using the security updates will be the case.
> > EPEL-7 might be possible but not sure.
> > 
> > After that, the process for doing it in EPEL would be to email this
> > list with the reasons why an upgrade needs to be done, and then put in
> > a ticket https://pagure.io/epel/issues that we will discuss at the
> > next meeting. EPSCO would then probably give approval and you would
> > then send one more email announcing it is happening and bob's your
> > uncle.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux