On 3/9/19 7:16 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 9:47 AM Benjamin Pereto <benjamin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I saw that you rebuilt borgbackup ( >> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/borgbackup) for python3.6. >> >> thanks for that! >> >> Now I wanted to build a new package with the new upstream release and ran in >> some issues to deploy. >> The package depends on python3-llfuse and python3-msgpack. Thanks to the >> buildroot the package is built successfully, but submit it to testing would lead >> to install failures because of the missing new version of msgpack and llfuse. >> >> How should I approach that? Is it needed that the maintainers of llfuse and >> msgpack push the new version first to stable? >> >> Best regards, >> Benjamin > Hi Benjamin, > This is a very good question. > I'm sending it to epel-devel, because I'm sure you aren't the only > person that is going to ask it, and I want to make sure I/we give a > consistent answer to everyone. > Also, I'm sorta just the proven packager that volunteered to do the > rebuild. I'd rather the python-sig and/or developers give the final > answer. > > Epel Python Sig (or whoever was in charge of the python34 to python36 > change), what should Benjamin do with his package? You (or whoever makes the big python36 update) should add in that new build to that big update so it goes out with everything else. ;) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
