On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 11:19, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:14 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 09:34, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > Will this also allow more significant upgrades of EPEL packages between minor releases? >> > >> >> That is the purpose if the package maintainer and their consumers want it. > > > Ok. I ran into an issue on EPEL 7 where I needed to update a package so it could work with a package that was part of a Review Request. Then I found out someone was using my library as part of validated software they were developing. Lesson learned the hard way. Assuming this goes through I will be able to update on point releases and they can chose whether to update their whole system or not, in which case they would have to revalidate anyway. > Correct, and they can also grab the old version out of archives and do what they want versus dig through koji to find it. > Thanks, > Richard > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx