R P Herrold <herrold@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > What particular -devel are you seeking? Is it > non-versioned, such that you can work-around > with an earlier one? I gave an example; I assume the openmpi BRs are in the builder repo. > Customarily I would just bootstrap forward to a needed leaf > node package from the sources ... Obviously I can do that and set up a repo for use with mock, but you surely don't expect all package maintainers to do that. > That said, I don't find a > SRPMs' DVD. Sort of a strange omission in light of the making > available of binary RPMs > > I see later in the thread the suggestion to file a boog > > done: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1657930 What's that reporting, as it's not visible? [Red Hat making issues private makes me less likely to report bugs. After experiencing that, I expect to report bugs elsewhere if there's somewhere relevant.] _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
