On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 10:53:58 +0530 Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I downloaded and installed > > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta > > But many packages I use regularly are from EPEL. > > When can we expect EPEL 8 Beta/Alpha? I seem to remember that for EL-7 we generally just branched the f19 packages for epel7, rebuilt and that was pretty much it. That's not going to work for EL-8, which looks like it's going to need significant investments in modules. For instance, there are a large number of perl module packages in EPEL-7, which would need rebuilding for both perl 5.24 and perl 5.26 as both versions are available as modules in EL-8 beta. Or do we just support the default perl stack? Does everything go in one perl module or is there a hierarchy? Similar could apply for libraries and the applications that require them - how is the module hierarchy going to be defined? Separate libraries and application modules, or libraries bundled with applications? Or take it on a case by case basis? I'm very much new to modularity myself and haven't got my head round what I think would be the best approach yet. Paul. _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx