Re: EPEL7 Bad-Dependencies Tracking Bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My apologies for delaying my work on this.
Priorities got shifted so I'm starting this work today.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:50 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 13:00, Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Here are the list of packages with bad dependencies, their bug URL,
> > and current status.
> > For those that still have "No Comment" tomorrow, I will start going
> > through and fixing.
> > For those that want to be removed, I'll be doing that tomorrow as well.
> >
>
> Thanks. We 'approved' this at the meeting today so go ahead. Thank you
> very much for the work. And I agree with your assessments on package
> that might need removal if needed.
>
> > airinv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647583
> > - Rebuilt - On QA
> > anjuta https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648003
> > - Rebuilt - On QA
> > banshee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647999
> > - No Comment
> > beets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647995
> > - Wants Removed
> > bionetgen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647989
> > - Rebuilt - On QA
> > cinnamon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647181
> > - Want Removed
> > cjdns-graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647987
> > - Rebuilt - On QA
> > jabber-roster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647977
> > - No Comment
> > libpeas-loader-python3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647973
> > - No Comment
> > notify-sharp3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647623
> > - No Comment
> > opensips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647622
> > - No Comment
> > perl-GTop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647620
> > - Rebuilt - On QA
> > python-atomic-reactor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647613
> > - Wants Removed
> > python-django16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647611
> > - Rebuilt - On QA
> > python-proliantutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647614
> > - No Comment
> > python-adal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647605
> > - Assigned
> > python-pyfakefs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647603
> > - No Comment
> > python-pygithub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647602
> > - No Comment
> > python-yamlordereddictloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647597
> > - No Comment
> > ruby-qpid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647592
> > - No Comment (I recommend removal)
> > rubygem-apipie-bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647585
> > - Wants Removed
> > simcrs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647584
> > - Rebuilt - On QA
> > slim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647581
> > - No Comment
> > xfce4-vala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647569
> > - Rebuilt - On QA
> > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:35 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I'm going through the lists of EPEL7 packages that are not able to be
> > > > installed on RHEL 7.6, and opening bugzilla's for them.  I am keeping
> > > > track of all those bugs with a tracker bug.[1]
> > > > My apologies to the epel-release maintainers for using their package
> > > > for the tracker.
> > > >
> > > > I've only created 6 bugs thus far, and only 1 of those bugs is because
> > > > of RHEL 7.6.
> > > > Because I'm verifying each failed install, and tracking down the basic
> > > > problem, it's taking me a little longer.  It might take a couple of
> > > > days.
> > > > I'll send an email when I'm done.
> > > >
> > > > Troy
> > > >
> > > > [1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647564
> > >
> > > I'm pretty much done for now.
> > > I didn't do any nodejs or golang bugs because all of their failing
> > > dependencies are in EPEL, not RHEL.  Or perhaps I should say they
> > > *aren't* in EPEL :)
> > >
> > > A few numbers
> > >
> > > bugs created for uninstallable EPEL7 packages - 24
> > > nodejs uninstallable packages - 11
> > > golang uninstallable packages - 18
> > >
> > > Total EPEL7 binary packages[2] - 12,547
> > > ^^ Above installable on RHEL 7.6 - 12,043
> > > ^^ Above not installable on RHEL 7.6 - 504
> > >
> > > Why such a big difference between 504 uninstallable binary packages,
> > > but only 53 potential bugs?
> > > 1 - bugs are against source packages.  The bottom checks are against
> > > binary packages.  My guess is that the 50 bugs cover about 150 binary
> > > packages because each source can have more than one package.  And when
> > > I was looking at the packages, it looked like about an average of
> > > three binaries per source.
> > > 2 - repoquery (used to generate the bug list) went to the heart of the
> > > problems.  So if package A is uninstallable, and package B depends on
> > > A.  We don't file a bug for package B, only A.  For some of those
> > > nodejs packages, I've seen one package A with a bad dependency, cause
> > > 25 to 50 package B's, who aren't installable due to A not being
> > > installable.
> > > 3 - It's possible that we might have missed a few packages.
> > >
> > > Troy
> > >
> > > [2] - "binary packages" are the packages that you get build an rpm.
> > > It doesn't mean the package contain *only* binaries, because it might
> > > be an rpm full of scripts, or just documentation.
> > _______________________________________________
> > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux