On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:22:01 -0400 Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > However, this was decided a while ago and it may not be the best > convention to use or one that the current python sig would like us to > use. I would like to get a naming convention cleared up and documented > so when we do a mass rebuild that the packages come out with either a > python3-<foo> or python36-<foo> I'd very much prefer python3-<foo> naming just because it would make python3 packaging much more consistent with fedora. But I'd want to point out that add problem to all packages currently named as python3-<foo> (packages where python2 counterpart is part of rhel). Because python3-<foo> can't have sub-package named python3-<foo>. -- Tuomo Soini <tis@xxxxxxxxx> Foobar Linux services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy <https://foobar.fi/> _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
