>>>>> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> writes: SJS> Things don't work that quickly. Well, they can work pretty quickly when the stars align. SJS> We have processes that need to be followed for packages to be SJS> reviewed and such. I would argue that reviews aren't actually needed due to the exemption about different versions of existing packages. I guess maybe that's stretching it just slightly (since that's mainly about adding, say, python-sqlalchemy1.1 without review instead of python3-sqlalchemy), but I would be perfectly happy to click the necessary button there. The only finesse involved is making sure that package gets blocked in Fedora so that it only makes it into EPEL. That's no different from any other EPEL-only package. SJS> If you are not already a Fedora packager there will need to be SJS> steps to become one. Which shouldn't be too hard if Martin is prepared to be the maintainer of these things long term. There should be enough sponsors around reading this that someone is willing to help out. Me included if Martin is willing to hit me up on IRC. - J< _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
