On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:07:28AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Well, we need more information (or at least I do): > * Is 1.x still supported by upstream? I don't think so -- the last commit to the "darktable-1.6.x" branch is just over a year ago, Oct 21, 2015. > * Are there any known 1.x security issues? I don't think there are any known outstanding ones — CVE-2015-3885 was fixed in 1.6.7. > * Is the upgrade from 1.x to 2.x transparent for the user? ie, would > they have to do any manual steps to move config? or is that all done > by the application? It should be transparent, but it _is_ one way — if you make any edits in the new program, you can't go back. > * Is the "user experence" different between 1.x and 2.x? Eh. Judgement call. I'd say it's fundamentally the same, but there are many differences in both functionality and look & feel. Honestly, I think this is an example of an application which is not a great fit for EPEL. It'd be better if we would make a Flatpak which RHEL/CentOS users could transparently use. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
