>>>>> "d" == dani <dani@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: d> I think it is high time to rethink the single version of a package d> policy, and come up with some scheme that would allow for any package d> to maintain multiple versions in a consistent manner. We don't have such a policy. At least Fedora doesn't. In fact, adding another version of an existing package doesn't require a pass through the review process. The packages just need to not conflict and be named appropriately. Dealing with the names of binaries is left up to the packager. - J< _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
