On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:59:55 -0600 Dave Johansen <davejohansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I agree that how to handle SCLs can get really mess really fast, but > a lot of projects are jumping on the "modern C++" bandwagon and > allows devtoolset is low risk, easy to do and enables a lot of > packages to be built with EPEL that otherwise wouldn't be. It would be low risk if that was the only SCL in the repo. My understanding is that they are all there in the one repo, so if we enable that, everyone could start using anything thats in there. > Basically, I think that figuring out how to handle SCLs is a long term > issue that will take some serious work, but coming up with some simple > policies that allow it to be used in EPEL is something that should be > well within the realm of the possible. Perhaps. :) kevin
Attachment:
pgpnikLFfcv6o.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
