On 23/08/16 03:48, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Let me (or open a rel-eng ticket) when you want a epel7-nodejs6 side >> tag to build it into. Will make it easier so you don't need to deal >> with a billion build overrides etc. >> > > I'm not sure that will be strictly necessary; we figured out during the Fedora process that once we moved to the bundled NPM, we only had about a dozen packages that actually needed a rebuild to support Node.js 6.x (just the ones that build a native, archful module). > > But yes, I'll make sure to let you know if we decide it needs a side-tag. Nodejs 6 bundles openssl 1.0.2.h, where RHEL/CentOS have a much older version. That hasn't been an issue in Fedora; For CentOS, there is a build for Node.js 4 in cbs, including a patch to unbundle openssl and to make it work with the way older lib. Unless we have a comparable patch (if possible) for Node version 6, maybe we should stick with version 4? Matthias _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
