On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:54:13 +0100 Dave Love <d.love(a)liverpool.ac.uk> wrote: > I was reviewing some documentation which includes: > > Redhat for example has a very optimal tool chain which they use for > their Enterprise product line and it is not available to other > distributions (or rebuilds) and thus their resulting binaries and > libraries have been more performant then other Linux distributions > we have tested. > > Can someone say if that's correct? I assumed building was done > similarly to koji. > > (I could experiment, but it seems better to ask where someone > presumably knows, assuming they can say.) I don't know (I work for Red Hat, but am not directly involved with internal builds), but I am highly skeptical of the claim. That said, why not ask whoever wrote that doc for some kind of citation or proof? They say something about testing, so perhaps they have some proof of this? kevin
Attachment:
attachment.sig
Description: PGP signature
