We have submitted the new Rust packaging toolchain to EPEL 9: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fecd6bbae1 Please help test and provide karma. This update has been in epel9-next for a couple months now, but we can push it to epel9 now that RHEL 9.2 that contains python3.11 is GA. See below for the original announcement. On Sun Feb 26, 2023 at 16:31 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hello EPEL packagers, > > The latest version of the Rust packaging toolchain will soon be > available for EPEL 9 (i.e. rust2rpm v24, rust-packaging v24, and > cargo2rpm v0.1). This is a major upgrade from rust2rpm v21 which is > currently in EPEL 9, but also comes with the drawback that it now > requires Python >= 3.10. > > However, I have split the Rust packaging tools into three separate > projects (previously everything was in a monorepo) to make packaging > them easier: > > The two components which are needed at build-time (RPM macros + the > cargo2rpm Python module that powers them) can still be built for EPEL > 9, as cargo2rpm has no third-party dependencies and only needs Python > >= 3.10, and will hence be built with python3.11 on EPEL 9 as soon as > that is available. > > The spec generator (rust2rpm) has also been split off from > rust-packaging into a separate package, which will *not* be available > on EPEL 9. rust2rpm requires Python >= 3.10, but it also has a few > non-trivial third-party dependencies (most notably, jinja2). Since > most Rust packagers primarily work on Fedora, I don't think the effort > of packaging all missing dependencies for Python 3.11 just to make > /usr/bin/rust2rpm available for EPEL 9 would be worth it. > > There are three Pull Requests which will implement this update: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cargo2rpm/pull-request/1 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-packaging/pull-request/6 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/65 > (kudos to @gotmax23!) > > These changes (i.e. rust-packaging v24 + cargo2rpm) have now been live > in "production" in Fedora for over a week, and based on user and CI > feedback, I expect these updates to cause no regressions on EPEL 9. > > Fabio > _______________________________________________ > epel-announce mailing list -- epel-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-announce-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Happy packaging, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/They _______________________________________________ epel-announce mailing list -- epel-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-announce-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
