Re: CoreOS vs Anaconda toolchain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:53 PM Pat Riehecky <riehecky@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
This does indeed sound interesting.

Anaconda is one of the more complex bits of software I've worked with. 
It does a lot various things with a fair bit of flexibility.

My thoughts after 20 seconds of reflection (aka, not thought through at
all):

I wonder if it might make sense to converge on something driven by a
more modern workflow and tooling?  From one perspective
Anaconda/Ignition are system setup tools.  Might it make sense to begin
leveraging some of the automation tools to do some of this setup?  Or to
put another way: Could anaconda/ignition begin to transition into a well
defined Ansible workflow where the UI sets parameters?  For as much as I
love kickstart, a YAML formatted document might lend itself to templates
and easier transition to/from cloud providers....


Hi Pat,

Lars was looking into that for the osbuild. The problem is that Ansible doesn't have support for systems that are kind of dead (no running services etc.). However, I think that it would be a great way of sharing code with other system setup and system building tools.

Vendy
 
Pat




On 9/6/19 3:46 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> Hi, I wanted to link this here:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_coreos_coreos-2Dassembler_issues_91&d=DwICAg&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=OAMtP0DWou0nlXG7Kmxo2enjXJfwb1DXS9fwcaESuTE&m=YqP9qr3liUKA6uMbUFVdpgGdPTtGp7tzGww8AahLxA8&s=7G9J0U8mTAU7eDMuir3ky8hsJEHjBhllLrpArag0ztw&e=
> Most importantly starting from
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_coreos_coreos-2Dassembler_issues_91-23issuecomment-2D422830233&d=DwICAg&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=OAMtP0DWou0nlXG7Kmxo2enjXJfwb1DXS9fwcaESuTE&m=YqP9qr3liUKA6uMbUFVdpgGdPTtGp7tzGww8AahLxA8&s=ZmL0ktGZ4gBP1Cgpmz9QL3MbvKhOQLxZFTNj8ligiEQ&e=
> and the most recent ones.
>
> Would love to do some brainstorming about how we can share more code/ideas in general; I had some specific comments towards the end.
>
> One thing not explicitly noted there is how key Ignition is to FCOS (and derivatives like RHCOS) - having a common language that works in both bare metal as well as e.g. AWS and Azure is a big deal - and today the OpenShift 4 installer and the [machine-config-operator](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openshift_machine-2Dconfig-2Doperator_&d=DwICAg&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=OAMtP0DWou0nlXG7Kmxo2enjXJfwb1DXS9fwcaESuTE&m=YqP9qr3liUKA6uMbUFVdpgGdPTtGp7tzGww8AahLxA8&s=k-SXz0DOZeNsrdkDpZyg244dxo6akCX9r_RzkPHRIqY&e= ) are built heavily upon it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.redhat.com_mailman_listinfo_anaconda-2Ddevel-2Dlist&d=DwICAg&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=OAMtP0DWou0nlXG7Kmxo2enjXJfwb1DXS9fwcaESuTE&m=YqP9qr3liUKA6uMbUFVdpgGdPTtGp7tzGww8AahLxA8&s=hsNc4HvS01zWyo0UIHCxG87CGdpaMvaAlve6TA8iFeY&e=

--
Pat Riehecky

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux