On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 12:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Hi Adam! Thanks for bringing this up again. > So...what should we do? Here are the options as I see 'em: > > 1. Keep supporting btrfs > 2. Just modify the criterion with a btrfs exception, even if it's > weird > 3. Rewrite the criterion entirely > 4. Keep btrfs support in the installer (and blivet-gui) but hide it > as > we used to - require a special boot argument for it to be visible > 5. Drop btrfs support from the installer I like option 3 most. The current criteria have always seemed, to me, too vague. I'd be happy to help hash out the details if/when it happens. Option 4 is also somewhat appealing. David > > I'm bringing this to anaconda, kernel and test teams initially to > kick > around; if we agree on an approach we should then probably loop in > devel@ for wider review, unless the choice is 1). > > Thanks for any thoughts, folks! _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
