Re: Installer support for flatpak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:18 AM Martin Kolman <mkolman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Just a question what is the expected workflow ?

That Anaconda on the Atomic Workstation image always installs some
flatpacks from the repo on the ISO and the flatpacks to install are specified
as a static list.

Or should the user also be able to decide which flatapacks
will be installed (eq. via a kickstart command as Jirka proposed
or via the UI) ?

I don't think UI for that is needed or desired, really. Kickstart support
could be handy for people who want to create a custom image.

My goal for F29 is to just replace the desktop apps that are currently
installed as rpms with flatpaks. One thing to think about here is how
this list will be specified - so far, the apps are just in comps, together
with other rpms. 
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux