Hello Matthias,
Those steps sound reasonable to me. In addition to that (when those points
below will work) it could be nice to support flatpak as a kickstart command.
For example to add remote repositories and it even could be interesting
having flatpak as Anaconda payload so the %packages section will support them.
However, everything above is for later better look & feel, for the first version
the %post section is a great idea. It is nice proof of concept.
I have also a question are you planning to have Atomic Workstation Live DVD or
only netinst?
I'm looking forward to see Atomic Workstation in action ;),
Jirka
On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 11:32 +0000, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hi,I would like to discuss flatpak support for anaconda.
The issue comes up in the context of Atomic Workstation and
rpm-ostree. Currently, the OS image contains a bunch of
preinstalled desktop applications (as rpms). It would make a
lot more sense to move to installing all desktop applications
as flatpaks, so they are independent from the OS.
For preinstalled apps, that means anaconda may have to learn
a bit about flatpak. We are aiming to have flatpaks built in Fedora
infrastructure well before F29, and that would be the time when
we can consider preinstalling them.When I talked to Colin about this before, he suggesteda few steps for this:1) Make the flatpak command work in %post2) Add a flatpak repository to the isoIs there anything else that is needed ?Matthias_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
