On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 09:53 +0000, kldixon wrote: > I appear to have been deprived of my preferred method of installation > since Fedora 9, 'Installation Without Media' using the netinst iso. > > netinst 23_Beta iso does not report any Local Standard Disks > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274668 > > I seem to remember that there was a complaint, once, that the > installation medium was reported under 'Local Standard Disks'. If > this > was acted on, then a very useful installation method has been > precluded. > It may have been a relevant complaint if the installation medium was > a > DVD but I do not see why one should be prevented from installing to > the > the free space of a USB stick, if that is what you want, or, most > importantly, be prevented from installing to a single hard drive when > you do not have a DVD writer and your machine will not boot from USB > or > you do not have a spare USB stick handy. > > Is it now policy that you should not be able to install to the same > storage hardware that contains the installer? > If so, why? Yes. People could (and did) shoot themselves in the foot by trying to modify the partition table on the disk containing the installation media. We decided to eliminate one of the variations on installation instead of adding a wide array of protections via the GUI to allow this. Don't fret, there are still roughly 999,999 variations to choose from. You could probably still boot a kernel+initramfs from local storage and point to network-based LiveOS.img or install.img or whatever the stage2 image is called now. David > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
