Re: Summary of shared EFI system partition discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not sure why I am continuously included on this thread
Please ensure that you review your mail contacts to include only people relevant to conversation

Cheers 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 15 Oct 2015, at 1:14 AM, David Lehman <dlehman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 16:46 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> A couple of weeks ago this bug / issue was brought to my attention
>> since 
>> it effects the user experience:
>> 
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183880
>> 
>> We had a lot of discussion about it in #anaconda, especially
>> regarding 
>> what the user experience should be here, so I wanted to provide a 
>> run-down of what was discussed and what we'd decided to do moving
>> forward.
>> 
>> ======
>> 
>> TL;DR Summary:
>> 
>> - After a lot of discussion I think proposed solution #3 is the way
>> to 
>> go and there is a pull request with a patch that does it (plus a
>> video 
>> screencast!): https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/383
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is the ESP really so special? What about other shared filesystems? One
> could certainly have multiple linux installations that all use the same
> /home or /tunes or whatever. Should we schedule removal the first time
> the user asks us to remove one of these, or should we silently only
> remove it from the specified root in the UI until/unless they've
> removed it from the last root it's part of? I know the windows case is
> different in that the ESP is still shared even when the only root is
> "Unknown", but the rest seems to overlap.
> 
> David
> 
>> 
>> ======
>> 
>> 
>> Symptoms of Issues:
>> ===================
>> 
>> adamw helpfully made a screencast of the issue, which I'll describe
>> here 
>> as well in case the video stops working at some future point:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcUd4K0iM6c
>> 
>> - You have a dual-boot system with Windows and Fedora installed 
>> side-by-side, using UEFI. (/boot/efi used by both Windows and Fedora)
>> 
>> - Load up anaconda (presumably to remove / reinstall Fedora) and go
>> to 
>> the custom partitioning UI.
>> 
>> - The /boot/efi partition only shows up under the Fedora header. It's
>> not shown under the 'Unknown' header that represents the Windows 
>> installation.
>> 
>> - It's not clear from the UI then, that the /boot/efi partition is
>> used 
>> by more than one OS nor is it clear it's necessary for the Windows
>> stuff.
>> 
>> - If you want to remove Fedora, you start by clicking on one of the 
>> Fedora partitions and hit the '-' button to delete it. The dialog
>> that 
>> pops up has a helpful affordance that offers to delete all Fedora 
>> partitions in one go for you (delete-all-parts.png, attached).
>> 
>> - Problem is if you use the affordance of deleting all partitions at 
>> once (or just delete them all, one-by-one, not realizing /boot/efi is
>> shared), you'll end up with a new Fedora install and an unbootable 
>> Windows install.
>> 
>> 
>> Assumptions / Caveats:
>> ======================
>> 
>> - Dual boot support is something we provide a minimal level of
>> support 
>> for. "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside
>> an 
>> existing clean Windows installation and install a bootloader which
>> can 
>> boot into both Windows and Fedora." (from Fedora final release
>> criteria)
>> 
>> - The issue does not happen with the reclaim space or automatic 
>> partitioning paths, which are the recommended paths for this use
>> case. 
>> Custom partitioning is a third case here and the case where we expect
>> the most of the user and their knowledge (altho is the required path
>> for 
>> non-default FS / container type.) Custom part is not about education
>> of 
>> users, it's about giving users access to controls beyond the
>> recommended 
>> defaults we supply.
>> 
>> - What about disks that haven't been selected? e.g., could a windows 
>> install that uses an ESP on the selected disks be on a disk that is 
>> unselected, so we can't detect that the ESP could be potentially used
>> by 
>> another OS? (Could always put ESP under unknown.... this would be
>> safe.) 
>> It's also - if at all possible - going to be extremely rare that
>> Windows 
>> would be on the different disk than the ESP so this case is minimal 
>> enough not to be much of a nuisance hopefully.
>> 
>> - Windows multibooters do the Windows install first, and Fedora
>> second.
>> 
>> 
>> Summary of Issues / Angles of Approach
>> =======================================
>> 
>> 1) ESPs are special.
>> 
>> EFI system partitions (ESPs) are kind of 'special' (isn't everything
>> in 
>> storage?!) in that they aren't really related to the OS, so if you're
>> trying to delete an OS you don't necessarily want to delete the ESP. 
>> Anaconda intentionally reuses any existing ESPs when installing
>> Fedora 
>> which results in shared ESPs for multi-boot systems. (It is possible
>> to 
>> manually create a new ESP by not clicking on the 'create them for me'
>> link in the UI, though, and everything will boot okay - adamw tested
>> this.)
>> 
>> ** We ended up persuing potential solutions that focused on this
>> angle 
>> of the problem as we have control over how we handle ESPs.
>> 
>> 
>> 2) We are limited in our ability to represent non-Linux OSes.
>> 
>> We don't have a way to detect Windows installations and identify them
>> as 
>> such and assemble them in the partition viewer the way we can with 
>> Fedora. The Windows partitions show up under an "Unknown" bucket and
>> we 
>> don't have a way of knowing the ESP is related so we don't put it in
>> the 
>> same bucket. (This is not the case for OSes we know about.)
>> 
>> Not a great angle to approach the problem from because we don't have 
>> control over what non-Fedora OSes do.
>> 
>> 
>> 3) No multi-select capability in partition widget.
>> 
>> While the checkbox affordance to delete all partitions in an OS is 
>> *very* nice, some multi-select capability in the widget to let
>> someone 
>> shift-click multiple partitions at once would provide more
>> flexibility 
>> and would at least allow for folks who knew not to delete the ESP to 
>> avoid it in their selection. (This would also help with managing
>> thinp 
>> or btrfs where you might have many, many partitions)
>> 
>> Pre-existing bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265620
>> 
>> 
>> Proposed Solutions:
>> ===================
>> 
>> (These were discussed both in the github pull request #377 
>> https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/377 and in #anaconda on 
>> October 1)
>> 
>> 1) New Bucket for ESPs
>> ----------------------
>> 
>> PR: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/377
>> 
>> Put all EFI system partitions into a separate 'bucket' in the
>> partition 
>> list.
>> 
>> This is jkonecny's PR. He created a separate "UEFI partitions" bucket
>> that the UEFI partitions would go in. The ESP wouldn't show up in the
>> existing system.
>> 
>> downside: the same ESP shows up in the UEFI partitions bucket
>> multiple 
>> times, one time for each OS root we know it's associated with. it's a
>> bit jarring to have multiple entries for the same thing.
>> 
>> downside: in the F23 timeline this was a lot of change late and there
>> was worry it might introduce other unforeseen issues.
>> 
>> 
>> SUMMARY:
>> 
>> We were worried the multiple entries per ESP would be too problematic
>> and thought #3 might be a more polished solution with a minimal
>> amount 
>> of change.
>> 
>> 
>> 2) Hide all firmware-boot related partitions
>> --------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Treat all firmware-boot related partitions as being details of the
>> boot 
>> process and hide them from the user.
>> 
>> "except then people would want an even more custom partitioning, that
>> allowed them to do things to everything" (clumens)
>> 
>> "i think there's a reasonable argument that by 'custom partitioning' 
>> what's really expected is 'custom layout of OS bits'" (adamw)
>> 
>> 
>> SUMMARY:
>> 
>> With our userbase, the loss of flexibility / control was going to be 
>> problematic and would escalate the issue in terms of UX. It's also a 
>> major code / functionality change. So this change is pretty big / 
>> complex and would have a lot of other effects we'd need a lot of 
>> planning around.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 3) Silently fail to delete ESPs when user checks off 'delete all'
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> PR:
>> https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/383
>> 
>> Patch Demos (via adamw shakycam):
>> - Windows/Fedora: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4PIOf8K538
>> - Fedora/Fedora: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgpOXgI1f-c
>> 
>> When 'delete all' is clicked, don't delete shared devices, and don't 
>> delete bootloader partitions if there are unknown partitions (for 
>> Windows multiboot case) or if the device is shown in more than one
>> root 
>> (for Linux multiboot case.) If there are no unknown partitions and we
>> know the ESP isn't shared, it will be deleted with delete all.
>> 
>> Basic assumption here is that we assume ESP is in use if there's
>> other 
>> stuff on the system we don't know about. So it's a more defensive
>> policy 
>> than the current one.
>> 
>> If you really want to delete it, it'll moved to "Unknown" bucket and 
>> then you can then hit the "-" button to delete it. Takes a little
>> extra 
>> effort, but still possible to delete, and you really are explicitly 
>> demonstrating you want the ESP specifically gone at that point.
>> 
>> Note that this option is different than always keeping the ESPs in 
>> unknown from the start (proposal #5,) because you get to see the ESP
>> in 
>> line with the OSes we know it's associated with before you do the
>> delete 
>> all action.
>> 
>> 
>> SUMMARY: adamw and mizmo think this is probably the best course of 
>> action from a UX POV. jkon supports the patch too in the PR.
>> 
>> 
>> 4) Simple string change in the dialog to warn users
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Patch: 
>> https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/377#issuecomment-1448082
>> 51
>> 
>> <dlehman> let's just put a little warning text when removing an ESP
>> (or 
>> when removing anything) and leave it at that
>> 
>> 
>> SUMMARY: This requires people to read, and they aren't always good
>> about 
>> doing that.
>> 
>> 
>> 5) Move ESPs to the Unknown Bucket
>> ----------------------------------
>> 
>> <mizmo> then you wouldn't even have to special case unknown
>> <mizmo> because the esp wouldn't be under the fedora OS bucket
>> anymore 
>> so when you do delete all ... it doesnt get deleted
>> <mizmo> if there's a single unknown partition => all ESPs go to
>> unknown 
>> bucket
>> <mizmo> if there's more than one known OS => all ESPs go to unknown
>> bucket
>> <mizmo> so ESP only shows up under an OS if it's unshared
>> 
>> downside: extra clicks to delete ESPs, but kind of good in that you 
>> don't delete unless you're sure.
>> 
>> downside: potential for ending up with multiple ESPs if people don't
>> use 
>> the autopart button. (mizmo noted that in usability tests majority of
>> users did use autopart and then modified from there.)
>> 
>> downside: you never get to see the ESP associated with the OSes we
>> know 
>> it's associated with.
>> 
>> 
>> SUMMARY: Option #3 is just a better solution.
>> 
>> 
>> 6) Do nothing
>> -------------
>> ...
>> 
>> 
>> SUMMARY: There are two separate bug reports over this issue (BZ
>> 1183880, 
>> BZ 1177976) and the UX could stand some improvement so from my
>> (mizmo) 
>> UX POV I don't recommend this option. :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Anyway, here are all the options and a rundown of what we were
>> thinking 
>> / talked about with relation to this issue. It's up to the anaconda 
>> development team how they would like to proceed, of course! Hopefully
>> this summary helps.
>> 
>> ~m
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
>> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list




[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux