Re: anaconda 22.20.2-1 / python-blivet 1.0.1-1 are DOA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:32:44PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 23:51 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Just in case folks don't see the update comment, there's two import 
> > issues which result in the new anaconda/blivet being completely 
> > broken:
> > 
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-22.20.2-1.fc22
> > ,python- blivet-1.0.1-1.fc22
> > 
> > Most notably, getPossiblePhysicalExtents() was removed from 
> > blivet.devicelibs.lvm without anaconda being adjusted to not use it 
> > any more.
> > 
> > As we need the update to fix Alpha blockers, it'd be appreciated if 
> > we could get fixed builds ASAP, thanks :)
> 
> So after some more work on this today, I think it turns out that we 
> didn't actually want to send python-blivet 1.0.1 to Alpha at all; it 
> was intended to land after Alpha (according to dlehman).
> 
> The good news is that, at least so far as I can see, none of the 
> changes in anaconda-22.20.2 - the fixes we actually want to get into 
> Alpha - depends on python-blivet 1.0.1. So I think for Alpha RC1 we 
> can simply take anaconda-22.20.2-1.fc22 and keep python-blivet-1.0-
> 1.fc22 (which is currently in stable). All we need to do that is an 
> update which only contains anaconda-22.20.2-1.fc22 (no python-blivet).

Done, here you go:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-22.20.2-1.fc22
 
> The big changes in blivet 1.0.1 can then land after Alpha and anaconda 
> can continue adjusting to them.
> 
> If we turn out to need further changes to anaconda and/or blivet for 
> Alpha, I guess we could branch from anaconda 22.20.2 / blivet 1.0 for 
> Alpha, and keep 22.20.3+ and 1.0.1+ as post-Alpha development branches.
> 
> Does that all sound OK to everyone? If so, it'd be great if someone 
> could submit the anaconda-22.20.2-1.fc22 update. Thanks!

Sounds like a mess, but I guess there isn't a better way.

Samantha

> I've added a similar note to 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197290 , it seemed the 
> best place to follow up in Bugzilla.
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list




[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux