----- Original Message ----- > On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 17:08 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote: > > > Installer is still a hot topic, but thats nothing we could resolve > > during our meeting and which might have to be brought up with FESCO again. > > So, as cmurf has been trying to point out on desktop@ , we (QA) have > some concerns in this area too, and I know the installer team is open to > the idea of at least simplifying the non-custom partitioning path to > some extent. > > This is an extremely complex topic area, though, and it may be tricky to > get the right things done if multiple teams are considering it in > different contexts in different meetings. It would probably be a Very > Good Idea to get everyone with an interest - at least anaconda team, the > product WGs (except possibly Cloud, depending on whether they intend to > use anaconda in their deliverables at all), base WG, and fesco - > together in some way to talk about it. devconf would've been great but > it already happened. Flock would be great but it's too late. Should we > try to set up some kind of special meeting / list / etherpad / > wikipage / *something* where we can all talk it over? Well, the question is if installer changes are short term goals or more long terms and before trying to setup any meeting, it would be nice to collect more data from other groups. So personally, I'd say Flock would be great opportunity to discuss it but on the other hand, it's always nice to be prepared for such conversation. The other groups Tech Spec should be available within a week, then let's try to look for overlapping pieces and I'm definitely volunteer to work on it. Once we have it, it's going to be a good time to discuss details and as Base, we should incorporate it to our Base design. Jaroslav _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
