Anaconda usability test rough plan for Devconf.cz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi folks,

Stephanie is going to be working on the final touches (fixing typos, adjusting typography, etc.) of the survey for the anaconda usability tests this week - thank you very much for all of the helpful feedback on list.

I wanted to share with you a potential rough plan for the usability test at Devconf, and I'd like to ask for your feedback on that as well.

Stephanie, Filip, and I have talked about given the time we have allotted at Devconf, we'll probably run two rounds of tests, with four users in each round. So we'll have 8 usability testers total. We talked a little bit about the type of users we'd like to have test anaconda, which I think was cc'ed to this list, but for easy reference they are as follows:

1) Novice users who may be new to linux who just want to install a desktop system 2) Experienced linux users who may dabble in system administration, are very technical, and like trying out different technologies 3) Professional system administrators who work with advanced storage devices and configurations, typically on the job, not for fun

Since installing Fedora without customization is the most basic thing a user can do, and it is so critical that any user be able to do that, we talked about recruiting 4 "novice" (#1 above) users to do basically just that - we'll hand them a Fedora disk (or point them at an ISO file) and simply ask that they install Fedora, with no special requirements or customizations needed.

We also talked about recruiting more technical users ("experienced" and "professional" / #2 & #3 above) for the remaining 4 slots. Since there are a lot of features and paths someone could take through Anaconda without unlimited time and testers, I would like to propose giving each of the 4 'technical' testers each their own version of the test, each one dealing with a particular feature of Anaconda:

1) Dual-boot: provide the user with a VM that has Windows installed, and see if the user can install Fedora alongside it without wiping Windows. How we do this depends on whether or not the shrink/resize partitions UI is available - did we drop it for final?

2) Customized LVM: provide the user with a diagram and writeup of a specific LVM layout we'd like him or her to use while installing Fedora.

3) Customized RAID: provide the user with a diagram and writeup of a specific RAID configuration we'd like him or her to use while installing Fedora.

4) Preserve /home: provide the user with a VM that has Fedora 17 installed on it with a separate /home directory, and see if the user can install Fedora 18 on top of Fedora 17 without wiping the /home directory from Fedora 17.

Some scenarios we are leaving out here:

- BTRFS configuration - there's actually a bug that is in F18 gold that complicates BTRFS installations (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893758) so it might not be a good idea to include this anyway.

- text mode UI - I think having 4 folks who are not American & native English speakers (the default setting for the UI now is English / us-en keyboard) is much more valuable than having one or more of them split off and do a text mode UI. We can test the text mode UI when we run tests where I am here in Boston if need be.

- no network case - Another lower priority test case that I can cover in Boston later on.

In case this explanation is confusing, here's a user-by-user rundown of what the usability tests at Devconf should look like:

- User #1: novice user, given free reign of installer with simple task of installing Fedora 18 to a VM. - User #2: novice user, given free reign of installer with simple task of installing Fedora 18 to a VM. - User #3: novice user, given free reign of installer with simple task of installing Fedora 18 to a VM. - User #4: novice user, given free reign of installer with simple task of installing Fedora 18 to a VM. - User #5: professional/experienced linux user, asked to install Fedora 18 alongside pre-existing Windows install. - User #6: professional/experienced linux user, asked to install Fedora 18 using a specific LVM configuration. - User #7: professional/experienced linux user, asked to install Fedora 18 using a specific RAID configuration. - User #8: professional/experienced linux user, asked to install Fedora 18 while preserving the /home from a previous Fedora 17 install.

Do you think this high-level, basic test plan makes sense? Are there higher-priority test cases we're missing here, do you think? Do you have ideas on how we might be able to run some of these tests using a VM, or do you foresee any issues with making some of these test cases possible at Devconf?

As always, feedback/advice very much appreciated.
~m

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux