On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 21:45 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/08/2012 09:36 PM, Chris Lumens wrote: > > No, this is absolutely not the direction we will be moving in. > > So which direction do you want to take the installer so we can easily > revert it should it become necessary or if the project would like to > release updated GA release with an updated installer? Below is my take. I'm not management, so technically that's all it is. We already have a focus for current and immediate-future development. Discussions are fine, but your expectations should be set that we're not about to change directions now. > > Surely the best method ( and the least effort ) would be to maintain the > same installer for all releases ( GA+Branched+Rawhide ) so what > different command code template being used based on "detect" release > being installed? We've just been discussing how much work it is to maintain the installer for one branch. Doing so for three branches sounds like 250% the work of doing it for one. > > What has been discussed, thrown out there to solve this/these problems? Fewer branches? Fewer install methods? Fewer install-time configurables? > > JBG > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
