----- 元のメッセージ ----- | Last time we went over it, what we did was add an explicit | translation | criterion for Final - "All critical path actions on release-blocking | desktop environments should correctly display all sufficiently | complete | translations available for use" - and agree that other i18n/l10n | issues | should be considered conditional infringements of the other criteria | and | handled that way. e.g. if you can't pick a keyboard map properly, | that's | a conditional infringement of "In most cases (see Blocker_Bug_FAQ), a | system installed according to any of the above criteria (or the | appropriate Beta or Final criteria, when applying this criterion to | those releases) must boot to the 'firstboot' utility on the first | boot | after installation, without unintended user intervention, unless the | user explicitly chooses to boot in non-graphical mode. This includes | correctly accessing any encrypted partitions when the correct | passphrase | is supplied. The firstboot utility must be able to create a working | user | account", because the passphrase you picked for an encrypted | partition | at install time would not be typed the same way when you came to | unlock | it. That's right. I thought it should works enough that way at that time. | I don't think someone just reading the process documentation is | necessarily going to figure out that dodge. So it fails that test. | (As | neatly shown by the fact that you posted this mail - obviously you | didn't figure it out :>) Well, not really. I think this criteria also affects to QA testing. though we could help for testing but that would be a good idea to have more testing widely, continually, and systematically, I just thought. so I'm here now :) | We have/had a trac ticket which was closed after the last go-round; I | re-opened it after having the thoughts described above. | https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/81 - let's follow up on it | there. Okay. | I _think_ this actually broke between Alpha and Beta, didn't it? I | might | be wrong, but I thought it worked at Alpha but then had got broken | for | Beta. No. as in the original report, it was there in even Alpha. -- Akira TAGOH _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
