On 06/14/2012 10:48 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 06/14/2012 09:46 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
On 06/14/2012 10:26 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 06/14/2012 08:33 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
MALLOC_CHECK_ is already set, so MALLOC_PERTURB_ makes a nice
complement
to it.
For more info on MALLOC_PERTURB_:
http://udrepper.livejournal.com/11429.html
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied, but I also put in another patch to use
MALLOC_PERTURB_=$(($RANDOM % 255 + 1)) if $RANDOM is defined. Can
you test
that it works on RHEL 5, since you seem to have that handy?
Tested with a few different RANDOM values and all 179 tests passed.
I was really wondering more about the syntax of the version I
committed ;)
Well, the syntax also got tested and it's working fine ;)
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
