Re: [lorax] Keep all filesystem tools?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/20/12 6:08 PM, Will Woods wrote:
> I think we should probably keep all binaries from filesystem tools
> packages. It would add approximately 700KB to the final images:
> 
> 	        compressed size[1]
> btrfs-progs:    120K
> e2fsprogs:      18K
> jfsutils:       131K
> ntfs-3g:	48K
> ntfsprogs:      138K
> xfsprogs:       209K
> TOTAL:		661K
> 
> This seems reasonable, especially when we offer the installer image as a
> rescue image..
> 
> Does this seem reasonable?

I like it.  :)  If you need to find a little room, there are a probably a few that could be dropped from xfsprogs & e2fsprogs that I could offer guidance on.

-Eric

> -w
> 
> [1] x86_64 binaries, compressed with xz
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux